From Control to Commitment in Our Work, Lives, and Communities
By Deborah Stallings, MA, SHRM-SCP
Executive Summary
Across workplaces, communities, faith institutions, and civic life, accountability has become a word people brace themselves for rather than embrace. It is often associated with blame, punishment, performance scores, and public failure rather than with growth, learning, responsibility, and trust. At the same time, trust in institutions, leaders, and one another continues to erode. Engagement declines, grievances rise, and people learn to protect themselves rather than take responsibility.
This paper argues that we are not facing a lack of accountability. We are facing a misunderstanding of accountability. Historically, accountability was rooted in responsibility, courage, and collective care. Today, it is too often reduced to control mechanisms that undermine dignity and motivation.
By revisiting historical leadership, examining current research, and drawing lessons from workplaces, churches or synagogues, nonprofits, and communities, this paper introduces Accountability 2.0: From Control to Commitment. This next generation approach reframes accountability as a shared human practice grounded in responsibility, trust, and purpose. When leaders and individuals embrace accountability without fear, they unlock stronger relationships, better outcomes, and sustainable success in 2026 and beyond.
A Story of Courage and Consequence
Long before accountability systems, performance reviews, or organizational charts existed, leadership was measured by courage and consequence. Harriet Tubman did not wait for permission, authority, or certainty before taking responsibility. She assumed it.
Born into slavery in the early 1800s, Tubman escaped bondage but refused to leave others behind. At a time when helping enslaved people flee was punishable by imprisonment or death, she returned again and again to the South as a conductor on the Underground Railroad. Using faith, strategy, and an unshakable moral compass, she guided dozens of men, women, and children to freedom. Each journey carried immense risk not only for those fleeing, but for Tubman herself.
Tubman led people to freedom under constant threat of capture and death. There were no metrics for success, no safety nets, and no room for blame. If something went wrong, there was no committee to assign fault, no report to file, no system to hide behind. Accountability was not about who failed. It was about who was willing to stand in the gap.
Her leadership was grounded in responsibility before results, trust before certainty, and commitment before control. People followed her not because she held authority or could punish them, but because they trusted her integrity and believed in the mission. That trust was built through consistency, sacrifice, and shared purpose. She did not promise safety. She promised truth, resolve, and unwavering commitment to the outcome.
The contrast with modern accountability is stark. Today, accountability often means identifying who will answer when things go wrong rather than creating the conditions for success. It is frequently framed as a mechanism of control rather than an expression of shared responsibility. Somewhere along the way, accountability lost its moral center and with it, much of its power to inspire trust, ownership, and courageous leadership.
How Accountability Lost Its Way
In modern organizations, accountability has become institutionalized through performance management systems, rankings, ratings, and perhaps rigid scorecards. While intended to drive clarity and results, these systems frequently produce unintended consequences.
Research from Gallup shows that only about one in five employees feels their performance is managed in a way that is fair, equitable, and motivates them to do outstanding work. Even fewer believe the metrics used to judge them are fully within their control. When accountability feels forced, arbitrary, or disconnected from reality, it becomes something to survive rather than something to own.
This shift reframed accountability as a backward-looking exercise focused on outcomes rather than a forward-looking commitment to success. The question quietly changed from “What will we do to win together?” to “Who will be responsible if we lose?”
In this environment, people learn to manage optics rather than outcomes. They protect themselves, document everything, and minimize risk. Innovation slows. Trust erodes. Responsibility shrinks.
The Trust Deficit
Accountability and trust are inseparable. When accountability systems feel unfair, opaque, or punitive, trust deteriorates quickly. Decades of research confirm that people are not as objective as systems assume. Bias, subjectivity, and inconsistent standards undermine confidence in evaluations and feedback.
When people do not trust the process, they become silent, become quiet quitters, or may even stop telling the truth. They hide mistakes, avoid ownership, and disengage emotionally. Accountability conversations turn into tense exchanges rather than meaningful dialogue.
This pattern extends far beyond the workplace. Churches struggle with accountability when authority is emphasized without transparency. Nonprofits face mission drift when responsibility is diffused, and outcomes are unclear. Communities fracture when people no longer believe accountability is applied with integrity.
Trust cannot be mandated. It must be earned through fairness, consistency, respect for all people, and dignity.
Responsibility Before Accountability
One of the most important distinctions often overlooked is the difference between responsibility and accountability.
Responsibility is internal. It is a choice to own outcomes before anyone asks. Accountability is external. It is the moment we answer for results after the fact.
Cultures obsessed with accountability often neglect responsibility. They rely on pressure rather than purpose, and on control rather than commitment. Yet high-trust environments, including military units and effective self-organizing teams, emphasize responsibility first.
When people feel responsible, they act with urgency and care even when no one is watching. When responsibility is absent, accountability becomes a blunt instrument that breeds compliance rather than excellence.
The most effective leaders understand this sequence. Responsibility creates trust. Trust enables accountability. Accountability reinforces growth.
From Control to Commitment
Leaders move from policing behavior to creating conditions for success. Clear expectations, adequate resources, realistic timelines, and ongoing feedback become the primary accountability tools. People commit to outcomes because they understand the purpose behind the work, not because they are being watched.
This shift is especially critical in a world where work is no longer confined to a single place. Remote, hybrid, and onsite environments have exposed a truth many organizations were reluctant to confront: accountability does not come from proximity. It comes from values, clarity, and culture.
The same dynamic exists in faith communities. Worshipping online versus gathering in person often sparks debate, yet the deeper truth remains unchanged. Presence alone does not create devotion, and absence does not signal disengagement. What builds relationship, trust, and growth is intention, participation, and shared commitment. In person connections can deepen relationships; however, they cannot replace responsibility.
From an accountability perspective, a person who lacks ownership in one environment will not suddenly become accountable in another. Productivity, integrity, and follow through are expressions of core values, not physical location. Culture is revealed not by where people sit, but by how they show up.
Accountability 2.0 asks a different question. Not “Where are you?” but “What do you own?”
Not “Are you visible?” but “Are you committed?”
Not “Are you compliant?” but “Are you aligned?”
When leaders anchor accountability in purpose, expectations, and trust, work and life harmony becomes possible. People are evaluated on their contributions, impact, and responsibility rather than on their presence. This approach honors humanity, respects autonomy, and strengthens trust across work, life, and community.
What the Research Confirms
Studies consistently show that proactive, solutions-focused accountability improves engagement, trust, and performance. Employees who receive consistent, meaningful feedback report higher fulfillment and stronger commitment to their work.
Neuroscience research highlights the importance of shared expectations and a sense of purpose. When expectations are clear, trust remains intact. When they are ambiguous, frustration and disengagement follow.
The evidence is clear. Accountability works when it is human centered.
Accountability Beyond the Workplace
Accountability without fear applies to every domain of life, not just where people earn a paycheck. The same dynamics that shape trust at work shape trust in our homes, our institutions, and our communities. Wherever people gather, accountability either strengthens relationships or quietly erodes them.
These patterns are not indictments of people or institutions. They are reflections of shared human behavior, shaped by pressure, fear, and competing demands.
In families, accountability shows up as honesty and ownership rather than defensiveness. It is the willingness to acknowledge impact, to love one another through both celebrations and conflict, to keep commitments, and to repair relationships when harm occurs.
In small businesses, accountability is often deeply personal. Culture is shaped quickly and visibly by the owner or leadership team. When responsibility is modeled and trust is present, people step up. When accountability is inconsistent or fear based, disengagement follows just as quickly, and small teams feel the effects of leadership choices immediately.
At the same time, small organizations are not immune to the same human dynamics seen elsewhere. Some individuals may seek out smaller workplaces for flexibility, reduced visibility, or a slower pace late in their careers. Others may be balancing multiple jobs, caregiving responsibilities, or competing priorities that dilute focus and follow-through. When expectations are unclear, accountability is uneven, or difficult conversations are avoided, underperformance can quietly take root. This is not a reflection of character, but of culture and clarity.
In enterprise organizations, accountability must be intentionally designed and consistently reinforced. Complex structures, multiple layers of leadership, and competing priorities can dilute ownership if responsibility is not clearly defined and values are not lived. When accountability is reduced to meaningless metrics, people protect their silos rather than contribute to shared success.
In government and public sector organizations, accountability carries an added dimension of public trust. Employees are accountable not only to leadership but also to the taxpayer dollars they spend and the communities they serve. When accountability is rooted in transparency, equity, and ethical leadership, confidence in public institutions grows. When it is perceived as political, arbitrary, or punitive, trust erodes and cynicism takes hold.
In churches and faith-based organizations, accountability requires transparency, shared responsibility, interactive planning, and moral courage. Authority without accountability undermines trust. Accountability without grace discourages honesty. Healthy faith communities balance truth, humility, and restoration.
In nonprofits and socially responsible organizations, accountability demands alignment between mission, behavior, and impact. Passion alone is not enough. Stewardship of people, resources, and purpose requires clear responsibility and ethical follow-through.
In communities, accountability grows when people take responsibility for collective wellbeing rather than waiting for someone else to act. It is reinforced when individuals see their actions as connected to something larger than themselves.
Across all of these spaces, the pattern is clear. Where accountability is rooted in shared values and responsibility, trust deepens and relationships strengthen. Where accountability is rooted in control, fear, or inconsistency, relationships fracture and purpose is lost.
Who Owns Accountability?
For organizational and business leaders, accountability begins with modeling ownership publicly, especially when things go wrong. Leaders set the tone by aligning values with decisions and replacing fear-based systems with clarity and support.
For human resources and people leaders, the work is to design systems that reinforce dignity, fairness, and transparency. Accountability must be taught as a relational skill, not enforced as a compliance tool.
For individuals, accountability starts with responsibility. Owning impact, telling the truth, and choosing integrity even when it is uncomfortable are the building blocks of trust.
Leadership is not positional. Accountability is not optional.
Scripture, Wisdom, and Moral Leadership
Luke 16:10 reminds us, “Whoever is faithful with very little will also be faithful with much.”
Accountability begins long before authority is granted. It is revealed in small, consistent acts of responsibility.
Leadership wisdom echoes this truth. As James Baldwin observed, “Not everything that is faced can be changed, but nothing can be changed until it is faced.” Accountability requires courage, honesty, and a willingness to stand in truth.
A Call to Courage
The future does not require more rules, tighter controls, or harsher consequences. It requires leaders and individuals willing to reclaim accountability as a human commitment rather than a managerial weapon.
Accountability without fear is not naïve. It is necessary.
When responsibility is owned, trust is built. When trust is present, accountability becomes a path to growth rather than something to endure. In our work, our lives, and our communities, the question is no longer who will be blamed, but who is willing to stand up.
That is the accountability our future requires.
References
Baldwin, J. (1962). As much truth as one can bear. The New York Times.
https://www.nytimes.com
Betterworks. (2023, June 16). Leadership accountability: Why it matters and how to fuel it.
https://www.betterworks.com
Carucci, R. (2022, June 4). It’s time to overhaul our understanding of accountability. Forbes.
https://www.forbes.com
Gallup. (2023). State of the global workplace: 2023 report. Gallup Press.
https://www.gallup.com
Galindo, L. (2019). The 85% solution: How personal accountability guarantees success—No nonsense, no excuses. Jossey-Bass.
Harvard Business Review. (2016). The performance management revolution.
https://hbr.org
McKinsey & Company. (2023). The state of organizations 2023.
https://www.mckinsey.com
Morieux, Y. (2014). As work gets more complex, six rules to simplify [TED Talk]. TED Conferences.
https://www.ted.com
NeuroLeadership Institute. (2025, June 24). 3 habits of accountable people (and how to build them).
https://neuroleadership.com
Rock, D., & Weller, C. (2024). Why accountability fails—and how to fix it. Fast Company.
https://www.fastcompany.com
Society for Human Resource Management. (2022). Leading with empathy while maintaining accountability.
https://www.shrm.org
U.S. National Park Service. (n.d.). Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad.
https://www.nps.gov
The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Zondervan. (Luke 16:10)
This paper reflects a synthesis of leadership research, historical scholarship, and the author’s professional experience in human resources, organizational leadership, and community-based work.
About Deborah Stallings, MA, SHRM-SCP
Deborah Stallings is a visionary CEO, speaker and educator, and human resources strategist who turns workplace chaos into clarity. She helps leaders handle what hurts before it happens, restore trust, and build high-performing teams rooted in purpose, truth, and care.
Her story began in Chicago’s public housing and on her grandparents’ farm in Mississippi, where she learned resilience, helping to care for her paralyzed mother and younger brother. Those humble beginnings shaped her faith, courage, lifelong learning, and the belief that leadership is a sacred responsibility to serve, uplift, and build with integrity.
As Founder and CEO of HR Anew, Deborah has spent more than 30 years transforming organizations through inclusive leadership and strategic HR innovation. Known for delivering hard truths with grace, she helps CEOs, executives, and nonprofit leaders make wise decisions that protect people, culture, and results.
When you work with Deborah, you gain more than an advisor; you gain a collaborator in transformation. Her team of Human Resources (HR), Recruitment, Training, and Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) experts shares her values of wisdom, excellence, continuous learning, and servant leadership. Together, they deliver solutions that prevent or reduce risk, save time and money, and create workplaces where people thrive.
Credentials and Impact
- 27 years CEO and Chief HR Officer, HR Anew.
- 35+ years HR expertise: Human Resources Strategy | Recruitment |Talent Development | Workplace Investigations.
- Fractional and fully outsourced strategic HR solutions for healthcare and mission-minded small businesses.
- Workplace Investigations and Training Expert for Government and Enterprise Employers.
- Featured Speaker on People | Purpose | Performance.
- Mom | Grandmother | Christian Educator and Teacher.
- Inspiring people to lead with confidence.
- Leads a WBENC nationally certified woman owned small business.
- Master’s Degree, Management and Leadership | Bachelor’s Degree, Business Administration, Notre Dame of Maryland University.
- Senior Certified Professional (SCP), Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM).
- Aspiring author and advocate for faith-filled, future-ready workplaces.
Deborah believes that when leaders align people, purpose, and performance, they do not just build companies; they build legacies.
About HR Anew
HR Anew is a leading human resources advisory and educational firm that integrates seamlessly into your organization to maximize success and inspire transformation. We work in harmony with your existing team or can serve as your entire HR department. Our presence brings peace of mind to executives, leaders, and teams. Whether on-site, virtual, or a customized blend of both, our solutions are designed to meet you where you are and scale as your needs evolve.
We bring deep expertise across human resources, recruitment, training, workplace investigations (EEO), inclusion and belonging initiatives, leadership development and mentoring, team development, workforce planning, and HR innovation. Guided by a vision to prioritize people and power performance, HR Anew delivers tailored solutions aligned with your strategic goals to drive measurable impact. Whether you need support with recruitment strategy, compliance, employee engagement, or strengthening your HR infrastructure, we collaborate with organizations to deliver excellence, speed, and sustainable growth.
You grow your business. We manage the HR details and complexities so you can focus on growth, impact, and the people you serve. From federal and multi-state compliance to employee relations, from engagement to performance management, we ensure your company benefits from the most current HR strategies and practices, helping you compete effectively and confidently.
Your people are your business, driving your culture, your results, and your long-term success. We are relationship builders and connectors who ensure your people are supported, informed, and empowered to perform at their highest level.
Let us get to know each other. Connect at CEO@hranew.com.